Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hines v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


August 19, 2010

JAMES HINES, PETITIONER,
v.
J. TAYLOR, SUPERINTENDENT, RESPONDENT

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on July 28, 2010 by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 23). On August 6, 2010, Petitioner James Hines ("Petitioner") filed objections to Report-Recommendation. Dkt. No. 24 ("Objections").

This Court is to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge... may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. The Court has considered the Objections, undertaken a de novo review of the record, and determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED, that no certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100819

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.