Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Freifeld v. U.S. Foodservice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


October 12, 2010

NICOLAE FREIFELD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Roanne L. Mann, United States Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In responding to this Court's Order To Show Cause with respect to the timeliness of defendants' removal of the case to federal court, defendants contend that the thirty-day period for removing the action did not begin to run until August 23, 2010, when plaintiff sent defendants copies of the summons and complaint by certified mail. See Affirmation in Support of Motion to Remove Action ¶¶ 13-15. Defendants misread the two cases relied upon, which hold that where, as here, service is effected on a statutory agent (such as New York's Secretary of State), the thirty-day period is measured from the defendants' receipt of the initial pleadings from the statutory agent. See Grello v. J.C. Penny Corp., No. 03 Civ. 8245 (CSH), 2003 WL 22772397, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2003); Rowland v. Giftcertifications.com, Inc., 195 F.Supp.2d 509, 512-13 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).

Defendants' submission is silent as to when they received the complaint from their designated statutory agent. Therefore, they have not established that removal was timely. They shall file sworn statements curing this omission by October 15, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

ROANNE L. MANN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20101012

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.