UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
November 1, 2010
CAMILO JORDAN, ALSO KNOWN AS CAMILO JORDON, PLAINTIFF,
RABINOWITZ; MR. RAMINENI; FERGUSON; HARRIS; PHILLIPS; AND KENNETH S. PERLMAN, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff, Camilo Jordan, commenced this civil rights action in December 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated August 24, 2010, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 30) dismissing plaintiff's complaint be granted and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff requested, and was granted, an extension of time in which to submit objections to the Report-Recommendation; and further requested a court-appointed attorney to assist him in his response. However, no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the file, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Peebles, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety;
3. Plaintiff's request for a court-appointed attorney is DENIED as moot; and
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.