SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
December 30, 2010
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court Michael L. D'Amico, J. rendered April 2, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree.
People v Lee
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND PINE, JJ.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the l
aw by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is
remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second
degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 ) and robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 ). We agree with defendant
that County Court failed to set forth on the record its determination denying defendant's request for youthful offender
treatment or the reasons for that determination (see CPL 720.20 ). Pursuant to CPL 720.20 (1), the court has a
statutory obligation to determine, on the record, whether an eligible youth should be afforded youthful offender
treatment where, as here, the defendant requests such treatment (see People v Rivera, 27 AD3d 491, lv denied
6 NY3d 897; People v Martinez, 301 AD2d 615, lv denied 99 NY2d 656). Despite defendant's eligibility for youthful
offender treatment, the court did not articulate the reasons for its denial of defendant's request. We therefore modify
the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing after a determination
whether defendant should be sentenced as a youthful offender (see People v Mattis, 46 AD3d 929, 932; Rivera, 27 AD3d 491; Martinez,
301 AD2d 615). In light of our determination, we do not address defendant's remaining contentions.
Entered: December 30, 2010
Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.