UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
January 7, 2011
ERIC ARMSTRONG, PLAINTIFF,
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
DORA B. SCHIRRO, COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION;
MR. ROBERT A. CRIPPS, WARDEN OF ANNA M. KROSS CENTER/C-95;
HON. MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG, MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY;
MR. RAYMOND KELLY, COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Loretta A. Preska, Chief United States District Judge:
ORDER DIRECTING UPDATED PRISONER AUTHORIZATION
Plaintiff brings this action pro se action. The Court directs Plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee or submit an updated Prisoner Authorization form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as detailed below.
In order to proceed with a civil action in this Court, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee or ask the Court to waive the fee by requesting to proceed in forma pauperis with a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff is a prisoner seeking to file a complaint in forma pauperis, Plaintiff is also subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (2). The PLRA requires the Court to collect the full filing fee from Plaintiff's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
Plaintiff submitted the IFP application with an outdated Prisoner Authorization form containing the old filing fee of $250.00.*fn1 Therefore, Plaintiff is directed to pay the $350.00 filing fee or, in the alternative, to submit a new Prisoner Authorization form to the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff submits the Prisoner Authorization form, it must bear the same docket number as this Order.*fn2
The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this Order, if proper, the case shall be reassigned to a district judge in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
LORETTA A. PRESKA Chief United States District Judge
New York, New York