Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jarrod Mccain v. Dimon & Bacorn

January 14, 2011

JARROD MCCAIN PLAINTIFF,
v.
DIMON & BACORN, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, MICHAEL SHAFER, LENARD HAINES [SIC] ,*FN1 DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff commenced this action alleging employment discrimination claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") and the New York State Human Rights Law ("Human Rights Law"). Defendants move to dismiss the Title VII claims brought against the individual defendants -- Michael Shafer and Lenard Haines. Plaintiff, through counsel, has responded and correctly acknowledged that, in the Second Circuit, "individuals are not subject to liability under Title VII." Wrighten v. Glowski, 232 F.3d 119, 120 (2d Cir. 2000) (per curiam); see Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1313 (2d Cir. 1995)("We now hold that individual defendants with supervisory control over a plaintiff may not be held personally liable under Title VII."), abrogated on other grounds by Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 118 S. Ct. 2257, 141 L. Ed.2d 633 (1998).

II. CONCLUSION

Therefore, Defendants' motion, dkt. #10, is GRANTED, and all Title VII claims against Defendants Michael Shafer and Lenard Haines are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.