Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pomona Medical Diagnostic A/A/O Celsa Intriago v. Mvaic

APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT


January 14, 2011

POMONA MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC A/A/O CELSA INTRIAGO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MVAIC,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Per curiam.

Pomona Med. Diagnostic v MVAIC

Appellate Term, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 14, 2011

PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres, JJ

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered June 30, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Order (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered June 30, 2010, affirmed, without costs.

Defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied, albeit for reasons other than those stated by Civil Court. In support of its contention that plaintiff's assignor was not a "qualified" person entitled to payment of first-party no-fault benefits by defendant (see Insurance Law § 5221[b]), defendant relied on inadmissible hearsay -- an uncertified computer printout of an "insurance activity expansion" (see Progressive Classic Ins. Co. v Kitchen, 46 AD3d 333 [2007]). In any event, the expansion does not establish that there was a policy of insurance in effect at the time of the accident (see generally id.; cf. Matter of Commercial Union Ins. Co. (Kim), 268 AD2d 296 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 762 [2000]). Defendant's submissions are also insufficient to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff's assignor did not comply with the notice of claim requirements (see Insurance Law § 5208). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT. I concurI concurI concur Decision Date: January 14, 2011

20110114

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.