UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
January 21, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CHRISTIAN GEROLD TARANTINO, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Seybert, District Judge
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
APPEARANCES: For the Government: Carrie Nicole Capwell, Esq.
James M. Miskiewicz, Esq.
Sean C. Flynn, Esq.
United States Attorney's Office 560 Federal Plaza Central Islip, NY 11722 For Defendant: Diarmuid White, Esq.
White & White 148 East 78th Street New York, NY 10021 James R. Froccaro, Esq.
20 Vanderventer Ave., Suite 103W Port Washington, NY 11050 Michael Rosen, Esq.
Law Office of Michael Rosen 61 Broadway, Suite 1105 New York, NY 10006
Pending before the Court is the Government's January 5, 2011 motion for an anonymous jury. For substantially the same reasons set forth in its motion, the Government's request is GRANTED. The Government outlined strong reasons why extra precautions are warranted in this case, including that the Defendant is allegedly responsible for two obstruction of justice murders, one of which was allegedly committed by an associate acting on the Defendant's behalf. The Defendant is facing a life sentence, and his present incarceration is no guarantee that he will not attempt to obstruct justice through contacts outside of jail. See, e.g., United States v. Gotti, 459 F.3d 296, 345-46 (2d Cir. 2006).
The Court will empanel an anonymous jury, taking care to safeguard the Defendant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial. See id. The names, addresses and places of employment of prospective jurors will not be revealed to either the parties or their attorneys. The Jury Questionnaire will advise prospective jurors of the anonymous nature of the jury, direct them not to discuss their potential jury service, and explain that these precautions are commonly taken to shield prospective jurors from unwanted attention that sometimes accompanies high-profile prosecutions. See United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 801 (2d Cir. 1994).
The jury will also park and enter the courthouse apart from the general public. From the time each juror survives any challenges for cause and peremptory challenges, the jurors will be directed to park their vehicles in the federal employee parking lot and to enter and exit the courthouse using the employee entrance.
The Court understands that the United States Marshals Service can accommodate these special procedures; the Government is directed to alert the Marshals Service to this Order. Also, inasmuch as they will share a parking lot during the trial, the prosecutors and case agents assigned to this matter are advised to take special care to avoid contact with the jurors.
Central Islip, New York
SO ORDERED. JOANNA SEYBERT , U.S.D.J.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.