Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In the Matter of Shirley A.S. Erie County Department v. Shari D.S.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department


February 18, 2011

IN THE MATTER OF SHIRLEY A.S. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
v.
SHARI D.S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF
SHIRLEY A.S. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
PETITIONER; DAVID A.S., RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.), entered December 22, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondents.

Matter of Shirley A.S. v Shari D.S.

Decided on February 18, 2011

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 18, 2011

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights with respect to respondents' child based on a finding of permanent neglect. Although the mother does not challenge Family Court's finding of permanent neglect, she contends that the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a suspended judgment. We reject that contention (see Matter of Elijah D., 74 AD3d 1846; Matter of Maryline A., 22 AD3d 227). When the dispositional hearing commenced, the mother was incarcerated in state prison for stealing money in order to purchase drugs. Although the mother had been released from prison by the last day of the hearing, she was living in a homeless shelter and did not yet have a job or any means to support the child. In addition, by her own admission, the mother had been addicted to illegal drugs for many years, and the child tested positive for codeine, morphine and opiates at birth. At the time of the hearing, the mother had not seen the child in 2½ years. In contrast, the proposed adoptive parents had been caring for the child since her birth, and she was apparently doing well in their custody. Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in freeing the child for adoption (see Elijah D., 74 AD3d 1846; Matter of Roystar T., 72 AD3d 1569, lv denied 15 NY3d 707; Matter of Samantha Stephanie R., 71 AD3d 484).

Entered: February 18, 2011

Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

20110218

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.