Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Alexander Jeong, J.), rendered March 30, 2009.
People v Jenkins (Eugene)
Decided on March 16, 2011
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
PRESENT:PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and STEINHARDT, JJ
The judgment convicted defendant, after a non-jury trial, of harassment in the second degree and attempted assault in the third degree.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a non-jury trial, of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 ) and attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00 ).
Defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 ; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of both offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 ; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 ), we accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity at the trial to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, observe their demeanor and assess their credibility (see People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888 ; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). Upon reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 ).
Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Golia and Steinhardt, JJ., concur.