UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 17, 2011
WILLIAM K. DUFFY, KENNETH HUBER, PHILLIP CAPOBIANCO, JOHN DUFFY, SCOTT ORDER ADRIAN, PAUL O'BRIEN, MARC HERBST,
JAMES HANEY, III, AND JAMES PRATT, III, AS TRUSTEES OF LOCAL 138 138A & 138B, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND, LEGAL FUND, APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND, AND
ANNUITY FUND, MICHAEL FANNING AS CEO OF THE CENTRAL PENSION FUND AND WILLIAM K. DUFFY, JR. AS PRESIDENT OF LOCAL 138, 138A, 138B & 138C, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, PLAINTIFFS,
WEBCO CONTRACTING OF ABERDEEN, INC., WEBCO INC. AND WILBERT E. BAKER, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Spatt, District Judge.
The plaintiffs commenced this action on or about December 3, 2009, asserting various labor-related claims against the defendants. On May 13, 2010, the Court entered a default judgment against the defendants, and referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle for an inquest as to damages. On October 12, 2010, Judge Boyle issued a thorough Report recommending that the plaintiff be awarded damages in the amount of: (1) unpaid contributions in the amount of $7,876.48; (2) interest in the amount of $2,023.86; (3) "double interest" in the amount of $2,023.86; (4) post-judgment interest, to be calculated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961; (5) attorney's fees in the amount of $6,303.00 and, (6) costs in the amount of $605.00. To date, no objection has been filed to Judge Boyle's Report and Recommendation.
In reviewing a report and recommendation, a court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). "To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (citing Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)). The Court has reviewed Judge Boyle's Report and finds it be persuasive and without any legal or factual errors. There being no objection to Judge Boyle's Report, the Court adopts the Report.
For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby: ORDERED that Judge Boyle's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a default judgment against the defendants in the amount recommended by Judge Boyle; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
Dated: Central Islip, New York
ARTHUR D. SPATT United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.