Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People of the State of v. Paul E. Turnbull

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department


March 17, 2011

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
PAUL E. TURNBULL, APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), entered April 20, 2010, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Rose, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Calendar Date: February 9, 2011

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.

Defendant pleaded guilty to possessing a sexual performance by a child and a probation violation petition in 2008, and was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 11/2 to 3 years. As his release from prison neared, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders prepared a risk assessment instrument determining that defendant's risk factor score warranted his classification as a risk level I sex offender. However, the Board noted defendant's prior conviction for possessing a sexual performance by a child, which constituted an override factor and presumptively subjected him to a risk level III classification (see Correction Law § 168-a [7] [c]; § 168-n [1]). County Court classified defendant as a risk level III predicate sex offender after a hearing, and defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant does not dispute that his prior conviction constituted an override factor giving rise to a presumptive risk level III classification, but instead claims that a downward departure is appropriate. That argument is not properly before us, as defendant not only declined to appear for the hearing before County Court despite being aware of the Board's recommendation, but defense counsel indicated that defendant did not challenge the override resulting in the risk level assessment (see People v Gilbert, 78 AD3d 1584, 1585-1586 [2010], lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [Feb. 10, 2011]; People v Jordan, 62 AD3d 1176, 1176-1177 [2009]). In any event, the record is devoid of proof that a downward departure is appropriate (see People v Williamson, 73 AD3d 1398, 1399 [2010]; People v Johnson, 46 AD3d 1032, 1033 [2007]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

20110317

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.