UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 18, 2011
PEDRO VEGA, PLAINTIFF,
DANIEL W. HATFIELD; MATTHEW A. MANN; JOHN DOE, "A.K.A" HALL CAPTAIN; EDWIN MENDEZ, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; RICHARD BEALL, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge
DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, Pedro Vega, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services ("DOCS"), has asserted various claims against DOCS and several individual employees of DOCS.
DOCS has moved to dismiss the claims against it, on the grounds of sovereign immunity. The motion is granted.
The Eleventh Amendment provides that "[t]he judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state." Although the amendment refers only to suits by citizens of other states and of foreign countries, "[t]he Supreme Court has interpreted the Eleventh Amendment to bar suits as well by citizens against their own state government." Meadows v. State of Indiana, 854 F.2d 1068, 1069 (7th Cir. 1988) (citing Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890)); accord Veloz v. New York, 35 F.Supp.2d 305, 310 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). The bar also applies not only to suits against the state itself, but to suits against any "arm of the state" such as DOCS. See Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Lodi, California, 302 F.3d 928, 957 n. 28 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 961 (2003); West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Ass'n v. Wooten, No. 2:08-CV-00835, 2008 WL 4835319, at *3 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 6, 2008); Bryant v. New York State DOCS Albany, 146 F.Supp.2d 422, 425 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Plaintiff's claims against DOCS are therefore barred by the Eleventh Amendment.
The motion to dismiss filed by the New York State Department of Correctional Services ("DOCS"), Dkt. #26, is granted, and plaintiff's claims against DOCS are dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Rochester, New York
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.