Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dana P. Brown v. Kevin Brun

March 24, 2011

DANA P. BROWN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KEVIN BRUN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard J. Arcara United States District Judge

ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed a motion for a default judgment. On March 14, 2011, Magistrate Judge Scott filed an amended report and recommendation denying plaintiff's motion as prematurely filed.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on March 21, 2011.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's motion is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. SO ORDERED.

Richard J. Arcar a

20110324

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.