Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Onel Medina-Sosa

April 5, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ONEL MEDINA-SOSA, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant moves (Dkt. #181and Dkt. #190), pro se, for an order pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 41(g) for the return of property. The Government responded to defendant's motions (Dkt. #195). For the reasons advanced by the Government in its response, I deny the motions. The property that defendant seeks to be returned was seized not by an agency of the Federal Government but by the Rochester City Police Department. Based on the authority cited by the Government, this Court has no jurisdiction to order the return of property that was not, and is not, in the possession of the United States or one of its agencies.

CONCLUSION

Defendant's motions (Dkt. #181 and Dkt. #190) for the return of seized property are in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110405

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.