Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Jones v. the New York State Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 15, 2011

WILLIAM JONES,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT; ANDREW CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,*FN1 DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dora L. Irizarry, U.S. District Judge:

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff William Jones filed this pro se action on July 7, 2010. By Order dated October 6, 2010, the court granted plaintiff thirty (30) days leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was advised that if he failed to comply with the Order within the time allowed, a judgment would be entered dismissing the complaint with prejudice. On October 29, 2010 and November 1, 2010, plaintiff filed letter motions seeking an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint. By Order dated November 19, 2010, the court granted plaintiff's request and ordered that he must file an amended complaint no later than December 30, 2010. On December 3, 2010, the court's November 19, 2010 Order , which was sent to the address plaintiff provided at Rikers Island, was returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable with the notation, "Return to Sender-EXP; Discharged." Moreover, plaintiff's name does not appear on either the New York City Department of Correction's Inmate Locator or on the New York State Department of Correctional Services Locator. (See http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/more/; and http://nysdocslookup.docs.state.ny.us/kinqw00.) As plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint to date, nor has he provided the court with a proper mailing address, the court has no way of contacting plaintiff and has no choice but to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice.*fn2

Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 269 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

DORA L. IRIZARRY United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.