United States District Court Southern District of New York
May 24, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John G. Koeltl, District Judge:
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The defendant moves for the early termination of his supervised release. He has served approximately three years of his five-year term of supervised release. He argues that he has complied with all of the terms of his supervised release.
However, the defendant has failed to show that there are exceptional circumstances or changed circumstances that warrant altering the original term of supervised release. See, e.g., United States v. Lussier, 104 F.3d 32, 36 (2d Cir. 1997).
Therefore, the defendant's application for early termination of supervised release is denied at this time. The denial is without prejudice to any application the defendant may make in the future explaining why there are exceptional or changed circumstances warranting the early termination of supervised release. The defendant should discuss this issue with the Probation Office.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.