June 28, 2011
REZPLEX, L.L.C., RESPONDENT,
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and its certified question answered in the affirmative.
Petitioner's non-ownership of the property where the City repaired a collapsing retaining wall was adequately raised in Petitioner's December 11, 2001 protest, which stated: "We are not aware of any emergency repair done at [Petitioner's] premises." Thus we need not decide whether the issue was one that could be raised for the first time after the administrative ruling. On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.