SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
August 1, 2011
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Putnam Valley, Putnam County (Gina C. Capone, J.), rendered December 15, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, after a non-jury trial, of building without a permit.
People v O'Hanlon (Vincent)
Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on August 1, 2011
PRESENT: NICOLAI, P.J., TANENBAUM and LaCAVA, JJ
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a non-jury trial, of building without a permit (Code of the Town of Putnam Valley § 165-80). Defendant's contention that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 ; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt defendant's guilt of building without a permit. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 ; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 ), we accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, observe their demeanor and assess their credibility (see People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 890 ; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 ). Upon a review of the record, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 ).
Defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or are unpreserved for appellate review.
Nicolai, P.J., Tanenbaum and LaCava, JJ., concur.
Decision Date:August 01, 2011
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.