UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
September 19, 2011
CUSHAAWN HARMON, PLAINTIFF,
J. HAMMILL, SERGEANT; D. LACLAIR, SUPERINTENDENT ; GETTMAN, SERGEANT; C. VOLPE, NURSE; JANE DOE, NURSE; T. DUMAS; E. BJORK, LIEUTENANT; R. BRAND, OFFICER; FLETCHER, SERGEANT; AND JOHN DOE, OFFICER, DEFENDANTS.
DECISION and ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 25, 2011, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 28).
Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 28) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to notify the Court of any change of address; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.