Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In the Matter of Robert Taylor v. Brian Fischer

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department


September 29, 2011

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT TAYLOR, PETITIONER,
v.
BRIAN FISCHER, AS COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Calendar Date: July 27, 2011

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was requested to provide a urine specimen for urinalysis testing, but claimed to be unable to do so even though he was offered a cup of water each hour for three consecutive hours, which he declined. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order and failing to comply with urinalysis testing procedures. He was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Duffy v Fischer, 78 AD3d 1384, 1385 [2010]; Matter of Moreno v Goord, 30 AD3d 708, 709 [2006]). While petitioner stated that he was unable to urinate due to a medical condition for which he had yet been evaluated, petitioner, in fact, admitted that he had provided urine specimens in the recent past, thereby presenting a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Sterling v Fischer, 75 AD3d 709 [2010]; Matter of Credle v Selsky, 46 AD3d 989, 990 [2007]). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

ENTER:

20110929

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.