Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Igor Yevstifeev, et al v. Brad Steve

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 30, 2011

IGOR YEVSTIFEEV, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BRAD STEVE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A TOWN OF
BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

ORDER

Defendants have moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, responded to the motion and defendants submitted a reply.

Now, by letter dated September 21, 2011, Igor Yevstifeev seeks to present some additional evidence which is essentially a sur-reply. By letter dated September 23, 2011, defendants opposed the request. Plaintiff, then, without obtaining court approval, filed his sur-reply anyway.

Such filings are not provided for in the rule without court approval, and I deny plaintiffs' request to submit another filing on defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court will not consider the document (Dkt. #77).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Rochester, New York

20110930

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.