UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
September 30, 2011
IGOR YEVSTIFEEV, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
BRAD STEVE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A TOWN OF
BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge
Defendants have moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, responded to the motion and defendants submitted a reply.
Now, by letter dated September 21, 2011, Igor Yevstifeev seeks to present some additional evidence which is essentially a sur-reply. By letter dated September 23, 2011, defendants opposed the request. Plaintiff, then, without obtaining court approval, filed his sur-reply anyway.
Such filings are not provided for in the rule without court approval, and I deny plaintiffs' request to submit another filing on defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court will not consider the document (Dkt. #77).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Rochester, New York
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.