Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Peter Paul Sweeney, J.), entered September 30, 2009.
PMR Physical Therapy v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on October 12, 2011
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., RIOS and STEINHARDT, JJ
The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order denying its unopposed motion for summary judgment.
"Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was supported by an affidavit of the president of a third-party billing company, who did not demonstrate that he possessed personal knowledge of plaintiff's business practices and procedures to establish that the documents annexed to plaintiff's motion papers constituted evidence in admissible form pursuant to CPLR 4518. As a result, plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment" (PMR Physical Therapy v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 20 Misc 3d 127[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51729[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]; see Matter of Carothers v GEICO Indem. Co., 79 AD3d 864 ; Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 31 Misc 3d 21 [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Rios and Steinhardt, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: October ...