Murray v 14 Morningside Ave. HDFC
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on November 2, 2011
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres, JJ
Plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, appeal from those portions of an order the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered November 29, 2010, which denied their motion for summary judgment for an additional credit on their security deposit, recovery of attorneys' fees, treble damages, and to compel tender of a two-year renewal lease, and granted that portion of defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing those claims.
Order (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered November 29, 2010, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Anil C. Singh, J. at Civil Court.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: November 2, 2011
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...