UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
November 17, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VICTOR WEXLER, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John G. Koeltl, District Judge:
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The defendant moves for an early termination of his term of supervised release. The defendant has completed his term of 24 months imprisonment and has completed approximately one year of his three-year term of supervised release. The defendant argues that his term of supervised release should be terminated because he wishes to go to California to visit his son and because he needs to travel for purposes of employment and it is inhibiting to get prior permission from the Probation Department.
The defendant has failed to show that there are any new or unforeseen circumstances that would warrant such an early termination at this time. See United States v. Lussier, 104 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 1997). While the defendant argues that he needs greater flexibility to visit his son in California and to travel for his job, there is no reason that permission could not be obtained from the probation officer for such travel. There is no showing that the probation officer has not granted such
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.