SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS Appellate Term, Second Department
December 5, 2011
G. DARCY GIBSON,
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Rye, Westchester County (Joseph L. Latwin, J.), entered April 23, 2010.
Gibson v Buckley
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on December 5, 2011
PRESENT: MOLIA, J.P., LaCAVA and IANNACCI, JJ
The judgment, after a non-jury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,650.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover fees for architectural services rendered to defendant. After a non-jury trial, the City Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,650. Upon a review of the record, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (UJCA 1804, 1807). The evidence adduced at trial established that plaintiff had performed the architectural services before defendant had terminated the contract.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Molia, J.P., LaCava and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 05, 2011
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.