Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raymond Gonzalez v. Dr. Donald Sawyer; Dr.

February 6, 2012

RAYMOND GONZALEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. DONALD SAWYER; DR. SHADIA HANNA; TODD HARMON, SECURITY HOSPITAL TREATMENT ASSISTANT; THOMAS NITTI, SECURITY HOSPITAL TREATMENT ASSISTANT;
MICHAEL NICOTERA, SECURITY HOSPITAL TREATMENT ASSISTANT; AND J. NADEAU, SECURITY HOSPITAL TREATMENT ASSISTANT, DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on January 6, 2012, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 40).

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1(c). No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 40) is APPROVED and

ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to appear for deposition (Dkt. No. 36) is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice against Defendant J. Nadeau, based upon Plaintiff's failure to effectuate service upon that Defendant within the prescribed time periods; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120206

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.