Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People of the State of New York v. Diana M. Flinn

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department


February 10, 2012

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
RESPONDENT,
v.
DIANA M. FLINN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered July 2, 2010.

People v Flinn

Decided on February 10, 2012

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

(APPEAL NO. 1.)

The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon her conviction of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]) and imposing a sentence of one year in jail based on her violation of the terms and conditions of her probation. In appeal No. 2, defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon her conviction of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [1]) and imposing a sentence of imprisonment based on her violation of the terms and conditions of her probation.

We reject the contention of defendant in each appeal that the People failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated the terms and conditions of her probation (see CPL 410.70 [1], [3]; People v Donohue, 64 AD3d 1187; People v Bergman, 56 AD3d 1225, lv denied 12 NY3d 756). The People established that defendant operated a motor vehicle without the written permission of County Court and that she consumed alcoholic beverages before doing so in violation of the terms and conditions of her probation. Contrary to defendant's further contention in appeal No. 2, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 10, 2012

Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

20120210

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.