Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Chin Ling Han

February 16, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHIN LING HAN, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kiyo A. Matsumoto, United States District Judge:

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Plaintiff United States of America ("plaintiff") brought this action against defendant Chin Ling Han ("defendant") to collect outstanding unpaid liability for federal internal revenue taxes pursuant to the provisions of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401 and 7402(a) with the authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury and at the direction of the Attorney General of the United States.

Upon failure of defendant to appear, answer, or respond to the complaint, plaintiff requested the Clerk of Court to enter a default for defendant, which was entered on July 20, 2010. (See ECF No. 4, Motion for Entry of Default; ECF No. 5, Clerk's Entry of Default ("Clerk's Default J.").) Presently before the court is plaintiff's motion for default judgment, which seeks damages in the amount of $731,411.38. (ECF No. 7, Application for Entry of Default Judgment ("Pl. Mot.").)

Defendant has not submitted any opposition to plaintiff's motion, despite receiving notice and an opportunity to do so. (See Pl. Mot. at 3 (Certificate of Service dated June 3, 2011).)

For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff's motion for default judgment for the assessed and unpaid liabilities due and owing for defendant's federal income tax returns for the periods ending December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1996 ("tax year 1995" and "tax year 1996," respectively).

BACKGROUND

According to the complaint, defendant failed to pay the amounts owed in full for her federal income tax returns for the tax years 1995 and 1996. (ECF No. 1, Complaint ("Compl.") ¶¶ 3-5.) Defendant filed United States Individual Income Tax Returns (Forms 1040) jointly with her spouse, Mao Yang Lin, for tax years 1995 and 1996 on April 15, 1996 and April 15, 1997, respectively. (See ECF No. 8, Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Entry of Default Judgment ("Suppl. Mem.") at 1; ECF No. 8-1, Declaration of Andrew Barone dated October 14, 2011 ("Barone Decl.") ¶ 3.) On October 20, 1998, after the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") determined that there were tax deficiencies with respect to both tax years 1995 and 1996, defendant and her spouse executed a Form 872 (Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax) extending to June 30, 2000 the time within which additional federal income tax could be assessed for tax year 1995.*fn1 (Suppl. Mem. at 1-2; Barone Decl. ¶ 5.) The IRS completed its assessments for tax years 1995 and 1996 on February 28, 2000. (Suppl. Mem. at 2; Barone Decl. ¶ 6.)

The Internal Revenue Service has calculated the amount of defendant's unpaid taxes due and owing, including assessed taxes, penalties, and interest up to June 2, 2011, to be $728,746.62 for tax year 1995 and $2,664.76 for tax year 1996, for a total of $731,411.38. (Pl. Mot. at 1; ECF No. 7-2, Affidavit of Debt ("Aff. of Debt").) Plaintiff alleges that defendant was sent notices of the assessment and demands for payment for each of the amounts, but defendant has nevertheless refused, failed, or neglected to pay. (Compl. ¶¶ 3-5.)

Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action on February 25, 2010, served the Complaint on defendant on June 17, 2010, (see ECF No. 3, Summons Returned Executed), and the Clerk of Court entered a default against defendant on July 20, 2010 (see Clerk's Default J.). Plaintiff now seeks a default judgment in the amount of $731,411.38.

DISCUSSION

I. Liability

Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the court may enter judgment against a defaulting party when a plaintiff moves for judgment against an adverse party who has failed to answer or otherwise appear in the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). When a default judgment is entered, the defendant's failure to respond constitutes an admission of the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint, except as to the allegations relating to damages. See Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992). Moreover, an inquest by affidavit, without an in-person hearing, may be conducted so long as the court can ensure "a basis for the damages specified in the default judgment." Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 111 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting Fustok v. ContiCommodity Servs., Inc., 873 F.2d 38, 40 (2d Cir. 1989)). Thus, the movant need only show adequate support for the relief it seeks.

The United States may commence an action in federal court to collect unpaid federal taxes. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401, 7402(a); Beeler v. United States, 894 F. Supp. 761, 771-72 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) ("The Court has jurisdiction over this [tax, and tax penalties, assessment, and collection] action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ . . . 7401, and 7402."). The government may seek to recover not only delinquent tax obligations but also statutory interest and penalties when the taxes are not timely paid. Section 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code provides:

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount (including any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with any costs that may accrue in addition thereto) shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.