Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered May 3, 2010.
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 17, 2012
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
The judgment convicted defendant, upon a non-jury verdict, of criminal contempt in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a non-jury trial of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [iii]), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We reject that contention. Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime in this non-jury trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), and affording appropriate deference to Supreme Court's credibility determinations (see People v Hill, 74 AD3d 1782, lv denied 15 NY3d 805), we conclude that the alleged deficiencies in the evidence are not so substantial as to render the verdict against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).
Finally, we note that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was convicted upon a plea of guilty, and it must therefore be amended to reflect that he was convicted upon a non-jury verdict (see People v Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286).
Entered: February 17, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...