Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent v. Walter Cates

New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts Appellate Division, First Department


February 21, 2012

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
WALTER CATES, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

People v Cates

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 21, 2012

Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta, Freedman, Richter, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), rendered June 10, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to defendant, that he was guilty of that charge but not of either murder or manslaughter. Nothing in either the People's case or defendant's testimony supported a theory that defendant participated in the vicious beating of the victim, but was merely a bystander to the victim's immediately ensuing death by strangulation (see People v Martinez, 30 AD3d 353 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 868 [2006]). Under the evidence, defendant either acted with a community of purpose with the other participants throughout the incident, or he did not participate at all and was not guilty of any crime (see e.g. People v White, 29 AD3d 457 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 819 [2006]).

Defendant's pro se ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal for lack of a sufficient record (see People v Love, 57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]). Defendant's remaining pro se claims are without merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 21, 2012

CLERK

20120221

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.