UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 9, 2012
LATEE ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF,
SGT. ROME, PRISON WATCH COMMANDER; CHASE; THOPMAS, # SERGEANT; BISHOP, SHIELD # SERGEANT; D. GREENE, SHIELD # CO.; R. BESSETTE, SHIELD # CO.; TEN JOHN DOE, SHIELD # CO.; JOHN DOE, # LT. WATCH COMMD.; JOHN DOES, SHIELD # SUPERINTENDENT; GARNEAU, SHIELD # RN; STURGER, SHIELD # RN MEDICAL; ATKINSON, SHIELD # RN MEDICAL; JOHNSTON, SHIELD # DR P.A. MEDICAL; AND CRAIG ROWE, DEFENDANTS.
DECISION and ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 10, 2012 by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 41). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Homer's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 41) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 32) is GRANTED as to: (1) all claims against Defendants in their official capacities; (2) any First Amendment claims in conjunction with allegations of retaliation and the filing of false misbehavior reports with respect to defendants Chase, Bishop, Bessette, and Greene; and (3) all claims against Defendant Johnston; all such claims are therefore DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 32) is DENIED in all other respects; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.