Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Phyllis Harmon v. Invention Submission Corporation and Walter Scott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 13, 2012

PHYLLIS HARMON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION AND WALTER SCOTT,, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael A. Telesca United States District Judge

ORDER

-PS-O-

Plaintiff Phyllis Harmon, proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was directed to show on what basis this Court has jurisdiction over the matter by January 24, 2012 (Docket # 3). Plaintiff thereafter requested, and was granted, an extension of time to amend the complaint (Docket # 5). The date by which plaintiff was directed to respond as to the basis for jurisdiction, February 28, 2012, has now passed. In addition, the copy of the Order granting the extension of time was sent by certified mail to the address provided by plaintiff and has been returned to the Court as unclaimed and unable to forward. Because Plaintiff has failed to respond to the court's request for an explanation as to the purported basis for jurisdiction over this matter, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Michael A. Telesca

20120313

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.