Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Crenshaw v. Correction Officer Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 30, 2012

WILLIAM CRENSHAW, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CORRECTION OFFICER HAMILTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

This Court referred all pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff moved to amend his complaint and in a thorough Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #115), Magistrate Judge Feldman discussed the facts of the case, the history of prior proceedings and the legal standards concerning such a request. Magistrate Judge Feldman recommended that the Court deny plaintiff's motion to amend or supplement his complaint.

The time within which to file objections has lapsed and no objections have been filed. In spite of the lack of objections, this Court carefully reviewed the pending motion (Dkt. #93) and the above-referenced Report and Recommendation. I see no reason to modify or reject the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. He carefully considered all the factors, and I agree with his assessment and, therefore, plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint (Dkt. #93) is in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120430

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.