New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
May 14, 2012
FIVE BORO PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, P.C. AS ASSIGNEE OF MARGARETTE COPES, APPELLANT, --
GEICO GENERAL INS. CO., RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Lisa S. Ottley, J.), entered May 4, 2010.
Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on May 14, 2012
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ
The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The appeal is deemed to be from a judgment of the same court entered November 3, 2010 dismissing the complaint (see CPLR 5501 [c]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denied its motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Civil Court found that defendant had established that it had timely denied the subject claims on the ground that the services at issue were not medically necessary, and that plaintiff had failed to rebut defendant's evidence. A judgment was subsequently entered, from which this appeal is deemed to have been taken (see CPLR 5501 [c]).
Contrary to plaintiff's argument on appeal, defendant was not required to annex to its motion papers copies of the medical records which were reviewed by defendant's peer reviewer (see Elmont Open MRI & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 30 Misc 3d 126[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 52222[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2010]; Urban Radiology, P.C. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 27 Misc 3d 140[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50987[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]). As plaintiff's remaining contentions on appeal are similarly without merit, the judgment is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Rios and Aliotta, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: May 14, 2012
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.