New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts Appellate Division, First Department
June 5, 2012
IN RE RICHARD A. OTTO, FILE DECEASED. REGAN OTTO SCHROEDER, ET AL., MOVANTS-RESPONDENTS,
MARIA OTTO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Matter of Otto
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on June 5, 2012
Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman, Richter, JJ.
Order, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Nora S. Anderson, S.), entered on or about August 30, 2011, which granted co-executors Regan Otto Schroeder and Jed Isaacs's motion for a protective order to prevent objectant Maria Otto from obtaining any discovery related to RB Holdings Corp., except to the extent of records necessary to substantiate certain professional fees, and granted Otto's motion to compel to the same extent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Otto is bound by the settlement agreement she signed that resolved the issue of the payments she now attempts to contest (see Butterfield v Cowing, 112 NY 486, 492 ). Moreover, none of the documents about which she now raises issues are new to her, and all the issues could have been raised by one of her many previous counsel (see Matter of Souza, 80 AD3d 446 ).
We have considered Otto's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 5, 2012
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.