Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered May 12, 2010.
Village Chiropractic v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co.
Decided on August 23, 2012
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON and RIOS, JJ
The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and awarded motion costs to plaintiff.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and awarded motion costs to plaintiff.
As the affidavit of plaintiff's treating chiropractor demonstrated the
existence of a triable issue of fact as to the medical necessity of
the services at issue, we find no basis to disturb so much of the
order as denied defendant's motion for summary judgment (see Ozone
Park Chiropractic v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 32 Misc 3d 134[A], 2011
NY Slip Op 51453[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]). We further
find that the award of motion costs to plaintiff was not an improper exercise of discretion (CPLR 8106; CCA 1903; see Babikian v
Nikki Midtown, LLC, 60 AD3d 470 ; Greenspan v Rockefeller
Ctr. Mgt. Corp., 268 AD2d 236 ).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: August ...