Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mohammad Akman v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


August 29, 2012

MOHAMMAD AKMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF DELAWARE, INC., D/B/A PEP BOYS AUTO, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Margo K. Brodie, United States District Judge:

ORDER

Plaintiff Mohammad Akman filed the above-captioned action on July 5, 2011, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State Human Rights Law. On June 18, 2012, Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to prosecute. (Docket No. 19.) Specifically, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint due to Plaintiff's discovery deficiencies and multiple violations of Court orders. Id. On June 19, 2012, Magistrate Judge Mann issued an Order to Show Cause, directing Plaintiff to show cause, in person, on June 22, 2012, why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for repeated violations of discovery orders pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(v) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and why additional monetary sanctions should not be imposed pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's inherent authority. Plaintiff's counsel appeared on June 22, 2012, and Magistrate Judge Mann noted that Plaintiff's counsel "makes excuses for again violating a court order (the 6/14/12 Minute Entry) but has no explanation for having failed to apply to the Court for additional time." (Docket No. 21, Jun. 22, 2012 Minute Entry.) Defendant renewed its motion to dismiss the case, and Magistrate Judge Mann took the matter under advisement. On August 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge Mann filed a Report & Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. No objections were filed.

This Court has reviewed the unopposed R&R, and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Mann's R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.

SO ORDERED:

MKB MARGO K. BRODIE United States District Judge

20120829

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.