Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brandy Lynn Fields v. Michael J. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 7, 2012

BRANDY LYNN FIELDS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Earl S. Hines United States Magistrate Judge

Jason P. Peck Special Assistant U.S. Attorney c/o Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278-0004 (212)264-2493 jasonppeck@ssa.gov Bar No. 516605

CONSENT ORDER TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 4 OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) : Hon. Norman A. Mordue, D.J. Hon. Earl S. Hines, M.J.

This matter having been opened to the Court by RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, and Jason P. Peck, Special Assistant United States Attorney, attorneys for Defendant, for an Order remanding the within cause of action to the Defendant pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that the following further administrative action may be taken; (1) the ALJ will give the Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing; (2) the ALJ will re-evaluate the Plaintiff's alleged impairments; (3) the ALJ and the Plaintiff may further develop the record; (4) the ALJ will evaluate Dr. Razzaq's assessment and re-assess the Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and; (5) the ALJ will consolidate this claim with the Plaintiff's application(s) subsequently filed on August 8, 2012.

Therefore, the Plaintiff, through the undersigned attorney, Peter L. Walton, Esq., having consented to the within order and the requested remand, and the Court having considered the matter,

IT IS on this ______ day of _______, 2012;

ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Defendant for the further administrative action set forth above, and it is further ORDERED that the within matter, be and hereby is, DISMISSED in accord with the decision in Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

7th Sept

The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry of the within order.

20120907

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.