Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thomas Burke, Richard Danitz, Robert J. Kulczyk, James M. Kilger, Bruce v. Eaton Associates

September 7, 2012

THOMAS BURKE, RICHARD DANITZ, ROBERT J. KULCZYK, JAMES M. KILGER, BRUCE HOFFMAN, GEORGE FERRARO, JAMES BIDDLE, SR. JOHN O'HARE, JR., JIM LOGAN, JOHN SIMMONS, AS TRUSTEES ON BEHALF OF THE BUFFALO CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, AND THE BUFFALO CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EATON ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: William M. Skretny Chief Judge United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs in this action are trustees and sponsors of the multiemployer Buffalo Carpenters Pension Fund (the "Fund"). Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendment Act of 1980 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et. seq., to recover ERISA withdrawal liability payments owed by Defendant Eaton Associates, Inc. ("Eaton"), in accordance with a termination agreement. Presently before this Court is Plaintiff's second motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, this Court finds the matter fully briefed and oral argument unnecessary, and concludes that the motion should be granted with respect to the 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2008 arrears plus associated interest, fees, and costs.

II. BACKGROUND

Eaton, as an employer, was a contributing member to the Fund in late 2001 when the Fund was terminated. At that time, Eaton, along with other former contributing members, entered into an agreement with the Fund, entitled "Term Sheet," which set forth the terms for Eaton's payment of its withdrawal liability associated with the termination.*fn1

(Att'y Decl. of Jonathan Johnsen, Esq., ¶¶ 6-9, Ex. D, Docket No. 18.) The Term Sheet limits Eaton's withdrawal liability as follows:

E. Beginning with the month after the Agreed Mass Withdrawal and with respect to each month thereafter for 180 months, [Eaton] shall pay to the Fund the greater of:

(1) an amount equal to the product of (a) $3.10 . . . multiplied by (b) each hour worked during the particular month by its employees within the craft and area jurisdiction of the collective bargaining agreement in effect as of the day of the Agreed Mass Withdrawal; and

(2) an amount equal to the quotient obtained when (a) sixty percent (60%) of the average yearly contribution paid by [Eaton] in the lowest three consecutive years in the ten (10) plan years preceding the day of the agreed mass withdrawal (b) is divided by twelve (12) ("Minimum Payment Obligation"). (Id.; see Eaton Affidavit, Ex. A.) Eaton's sole shareholder, director, and officer Clarke E. Eaton, Jr., averred that "[t]he Fund and the employer parties to the Term Sheet later agreed that the payment obligations contained in paragraph (E) would be paid and discharged on an annual (rather than monthly) basis." (Aff. of Clarke E. Eaton, Jr. ¶ 12, Ex. A, Docket No. 21; see Att'y Decl. of Jonathan Johnsen, Esq. ¶¶ 14-15, Docket No. 30.) As calculated by the Fund, Eaton's minimum annual obligation pursuant to the Term Sheet was $30,625.64, which could be reduced to zero if, for example, Eaton made contributions to the Fund based on a total of 10,000 hours of carpenter work in the area. (Johnsen Decl., ¶¶ 7, 9, 11-13, Ex. K, Docket No. 18.)

The Term Sheet also provides that Eaton would become liable for the entire amount of its withdrawal liability in the event it defaults on an agreed-upon payment:

N. For purposes of this Term Sheet, "default" means the failure of [Eaton] to make, when due, any payment under this Term Sheet, if the failure is not cured within 60 days after [Eaton] receives written notification from the Fund of such failure, and any other event defined in rules adopted by the Fund which indicates a substantial likelihood that an employer will be unable to pay its liability under this Term Sheet. An Undersigned Employer[, such as Eaton,] that defaults on its obligations under these Term Sheet is liable for the amount of mass withdrawal liability it would have incurred under sections 4211 and 4219(c)(1)(D) of ERISA, determined as of the Mass Withdrawal Date. Such an employer shall be required to make quarterly payments beginning within 60 days after the date of default on the schedule and in the amount determined under section 4219 (c)(1)(C)(i) of ERISA as of the Mass Withdrawal Date, with no credit for payments made under this Term Sheet prior to the default or debit for payments not made on the statutory schedule prior to the default. (See Eaton Aff., Ex. A; Johnsen Decl., ¶¶ 8,9, Ex. D, Docket No. 18.) Plaintiffs assert that Eaton's entire withdrawal liability is $677,777, payable in installments with interest, for an ultimate total of $870,673 upon default. (Johnsen Decl., ¶ 14, Ex. F, Docket No. 18; Johnsen Decl. ¶¶ 29-30, Docket No. 30.)

The Fund first invoiced Eaton pursuant to the Term Sheet on or about November 20, 2003, seeking $30,625.64 for Eaton's 2002 minimum obligation. (Johnsen Decl., ¶ 16, Ex.G, Docket No. 18; Johnsen Reply Decl. Ex. B, Docket No. 33.) In September 2004, Eaton was invoiced in the same amount for its 2003 minimum obligation. (Johnsen Reply Decl. Ex. C, Docket No. 33.) When Eaton failed to pay those invoices, the Fund sent notices stating that:

On behalf of the Fund, we demand immediate payment of all amounts due and owing as stated above and hereby give notice that if such payment is not forwarded to us or the Fund within 60 days of the date of the receipt of this letter, the Fund will consider that Eaton Associates is in default pursuant to Paragraph N of the Term Sheet and assess and collect withdrawal liability as provided for in such section. (Johnsen Decl. Ex. G, Docket No. 18.) The letters apparently prompted Eaton to request settlement discussions. (Johnsen Decl. ¶ 17, Docket No. 18.) While these discussions were ongoing, the Fund sent Eaton an invoice for the amount owed for 2006. (Id. ¶ 18, Ex. H.) Eaton again failed to pay, and another notice of default was sent in October 2007. (Id.) The settlement discussions resulted in an offer by Eaton in February 2008 to pay $500 per month on the past due amounts, to which the Fund's attorney countered with $1014.06 per month, an amount he believed the Fund "would be willing to accept," with payments to begin on March 1, 2008. (Johnsen Decl. ¶ 19, Ex. I, Docket No. 18.) Counsel stated in the counteroffer that, should Eaton find this arrangement acceptable, counsel would "get approval from the trustees and draft a settlement agreement." (Id.) The Fund received a check from Eaton in March 2008 in the amount of $1,014.00. (Id. Ex. J.) Eaton, however, refused to sign a settlement agreement formalizing the arrangement based on the counteroffer. (Id. ¶ 21.) According to Plaintiffs, Eaton again failed to pay the $30,625.64 owed for 2008, a fact not disputed by Eaton. (Johnsen Decl. ¶ 22, Docket No. 18.)

Plaintiffs commenced the instant action in July 2009 pursuant to ERISA "to collect from [Eaton] withdrawal liability owed by [Eaton] to the Fund." (Compl. ΒΆ 1.) Plaintiffs alleged in the complaint that Eaton owed $16,224 for 16 missed settlement payments and $30,625.64 for its ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.