State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
September 20, 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF MARIA R. HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT.
COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: July 30, 2012
Before: Peters, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 2011, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked for a commercial cleaning company for approximately six years. She got into a verbal dispute with a co-worker and ended up pushing the co-worker and throwing the co-worker's phone to the floor. The co-worker reported the incident to the owner, who informed claimant that she could no longer work for the company. Claimant, in turn, threatened the owner with physical harm, prompting the owner to file a police report. Following her termination, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving them because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Fighting with a co-worker has been held to constitute misconduct disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see Matter of Chisholm [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 1094 ; Matter of Bruner [Rochester City School Dist.--Commissioner of Labor], 22 AD3d 946, 947 ), as has engaging in threatening behavior (see Matter of Colindres [Commissioner of Labor], 91 AD3d 991, 992 ; Matter Messado [City of New York--Commissioner of Labor], 76 AD3d 740, 741 ). Here, both the co-worker and the owner of the company testified that claimant not only assaulted the co-worker, but also threatened to cause physical harm to the owner. Claimant's contrary testimony presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Reyna-Bautista [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1102, 1102-1103 ). Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, we find no reason to disturb it.
Peters, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.