Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People of the State of New York v. Ronnie Diggs

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department


September 28, 2012

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
RESPONDENT,
v.
RONNIE DIGGS,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered September 2, 2010.

People v Diggs

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 28, 2012

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (three counts), assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence pursuant to which Supreme Court added various terms of postrelease supervision (PRS) to the sentence previously imposed on his conviction, following a jury trial, of four counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [2], [4]), three counts of robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [1], [2] [a]), and one count each of assault in the second degree (§ 120.05 [2]), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [former (2)]). Defendant contends that the over seven-year gap between his original sentencing and his resentencing divested the court of jurisdiction to resentence him pursuant to CPL 380.30 (1) (see People v Williams,14 NY3d 198, 213). Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Dissottle, 68 AD3d 1542, 1543, lv denied 14 NY3d 799; People v Cecere, 39 AD3d 557, 558, lv denied 9 NY3d 873), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

20120928

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.