Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Edward Honig v. Forster & Garbus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


October 10, 2012

EDWARD HONIG PLAINTIFF,
v.
FORSTER & GARBUS, LLP, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge:

ORDER

Before the court is the defendant's letter application dated September 25, 2012, seeking to compel the plaintiff to appear for a deposition and requesting that the court so order a subpoena for the plaintiff's daughter. Both requests are denied. Although counsel for the defendant contends that his efforts to set a start time for the plaintiff's deposition have been fruitless, it is defense counsel's conflict that is now preventing the deposition from going forward on October 16 as agreed. Defense counsel is directed to contact plaintiff's counsel to discuss a mutually agreeable time for the plaintiff's deposition. With respect to the plaintiff's daughter, the court does not need to so order her non-party subpoena. The defendant has not attempted to serve the plaintiff's daughter with a subpoena and, instead, seeks to bypass the process with this application.

SO ORDERED:

ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20121010

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.