New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
October 10, 2012
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, --
RON MANGAL, APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Frederick C. Arriaga, J.), rendered March 6, 2010.
People v Mangal (Ron)
Decided on October 10, 2012
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON and RIOS, JJ
The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of petit larceny.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
After the People charged defendant with petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40), alleging that defendant had stolen property from a store, defendant pleaded guilty to petit larceny in satisfaction of the charges and received the bargained-for three-day sentence of incarceration. Defendant, a native of Guyana, argues on appeal that his due process rights were violated by the Criminal Court's failure to advise him of the possible deportation consequences of his plea. As defendant's contention is without merit (see e.g. People v Carty, 96 AD3d 1093, 1097 ; People v Ramnaraine, 92 AD3d 809 ; People v Thomas, 89 AD3d 964, 965 ; People v Romero, 82 AD3d 1013 ), the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur. Decision Date: October 10, 2012
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.