New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts Appellate Division, First Department
December 4, 2012
JESUS PAREDES, AN INFANT UNDER THE AGE OF FOURTEEN YEARS BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RAQUEL NUNEZ, ET AL.,
CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Decided on December 4, 2012
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Renwick, Freedman, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered June 7, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant Department of Education's (DOE) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
"It is well-settled that schools have a duty to adequately supervise their students, and will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Brandy B. v Eden Cent. School Dist., 15 NY3d 297, 302  [internal quotation marks omitted]). "[A] teacher owes it to his [or her] charges to exercise such care of them as a parent of ordinary prudence would observe in comparable circumstances" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49  [internal quotation marks omitted]).
Summary judgment should have been granted in this action where the infant plaintiff was injured in a spontaneous playground accident. Moreover, the DOE employee supervising the playground at the time of the accident testified that she instructed the students on how to properly ride the apparatus from which the infant plaintiff fell, and there is no indication that any type of focused, repetitive instruction would have prevented the accident (cf. Hunter v New York City Dept. of Educ., __ NY3d __, 2012 NY Slip Op 06994 , affg 95 AD3d 719, 719 [1st Dept 2012]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 4, 2012
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.