Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Laura Catalano v. Phillips & Cohen

December 11, 2012

LAURA CATALANO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PHILLIPS & COHEN, LTD., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge:

ORDER

Before the court is the defendant's unopposed motion to compel the plaintiff to respond to its interrogatories, request for the production of documents, and requests to admit. The defendant served its requests on the plaintiff on October 15 and 16. The plaintiff failed to timely respond. Although counsel for the defendant has contacted plaintiff's co-counsel, the plaintiff still has provided no responses. Accordingly, the motion is granted. On or before December 21, 2012, the plaintiff shall respond to all outstanding discovery requests. Additionally, by operation of Rule 36(a)(3), defendant's request for admissions are deemed admitted by virtue of plaintiff's failure to respond. If the plaintiff fails to respond to the outstanding discovery requests by December 21, the court will entertain a motion for sanctions.

SO ORDERED:

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20121211

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.