UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
December 20, 2012
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., PLAINTIFF,
TRACY BLAIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER, DIRECTOR, SHAREHOLDER AND/OR PRINCIPAL OF LONESTAR BAR & GRILL, AND TRACY BLAIS D/B/A LONESTAR BAR & GRILL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Block, Senior District Judge:
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On September 20, 2012, Magistrate Judge Go issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the defendants' answer be stricken and that they be deemed in default. Those recommendations were proposed as sanctions for defendants' failure to comply with a settlement agreement, failure to communicate with their attorney and failure to comply with court orders.
The R&R recited that "[a]ny objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed . . . by October 9, 2012," and that "[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal." R&R at 6. The R&R was mailed to defendants' last known address. To date, no objections have been filed.
If clear notice has been given of the consequences of failure to object, and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) ("Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's decision."). The Court will excuse the failure to object, however, and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000).
The R&R contains no error, let alone plain error. Accordingly, the Court adopts it without de novo review. Defendants' answer is stricken. The Clerk shall note their default on the docket.
FREDERIC BLOCK Senior United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.