Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eugene Palladino v. Cny Centro

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department


December 21, 2012

EUGENE PALLADINO,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CNY CENTRO, INC., CHARLES WATSON, AS BUSINESS AGENT OF AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 580 AND AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 580,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered April 12, 2012.

Palladino v CNY Centro, Inc.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Released on December 21, 2012

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the motions of defendants for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted in their entirety and the amended complaints are dismissed.

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order that granted only in part their respective motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaints against them. We agree with defendants that Supreme Court should have granted their motions in their entirety. Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 580 (Union) and Charles Watson, as business agent of the Union, contend that the Union is a voluntary unincorporated association and that plaintiff has failed even to plead that the Union's conduct was authorized or ratified by the entire membership of the association. We agree (see Martin v Curran, 303 NY 276, 282; Zanghi v Laborers' Intl. Union of N. Am., AFL-CIO, 8 AD3d 1033, 1034, lv denied 4 NY3d 703). Thus, we further agree with those defendants that plaintiff's contention that the Union breached its duty of fair representation is "fatally defective" (Walsh v Torres-Lynch, 266 AD2d 817, 818). In light of our conclusion, we do not address defendants' remaining contentions. Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

20121221

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.