New York Supreme and/or Appellate Courts SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
February 11, 2013
A.B. MEDICAL, PLLC AS ASSIGNEE OF LENNY VAPNER, APPELLANT, --
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered March 9, 2011.
A.B. Med., PLLC v GEICO
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on February 11, 2013
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., RIOS and SOLOMON, JJ
The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
A no-fault provider establishes its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by proof of the submission to the defendant of a claim form, proof of the fact and the amount of the loss sustained, and proof that the defendant either failed to pay or deny the claim within the requisite 30-day period, or issued a timely denial of claim that was conclusory, vague or without merit as a matter of law (see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; Westchester Med. Ctr. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 78 AD3d 1168 ; Ave T MPC Corp. v Auto One Ins. Co., 32 Misc 3d 128[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51292[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]). As plaintiff's affidavit in support of its motion failed to demonstrate that defendant's denial of claim forms were either untimely or without merit as a matter of law, plaintiff failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Rios and Solomon, JJ., concur. Decision Date: February 11, 2013
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.