Agresti v Silverstein Props., Inc.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Richter, Gische, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered June 14, 2012, which granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action as against defendants 1 World Trade Center LLC and Tishman Construction Corporation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff was injured when an improvised scaffold being used by two workers between two and five feet above plaintiff's head collapsed causing a wooden plank to fall and strike plaintiff in the head. Partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim was proper since an enumerated safety device, namely, the makeshift scaffold, proved inadequate to shield plaintiff from "the harm flow[ing] directly from the application of the force of gravity" (Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 13 NY3d 599, 604 ). Moreover, the lack of certainty as to exactly what preceded the accident or the fact that plaintiff failed to point to a specific defect in the scaffold does not require denial of the motion (see Rich v West 31st St. Assoc., LLC, 92 AD3d 433 [1st Dept 2012]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...